Hi everybody, I am a beginner user of Ls-Dyna. I am trying to simulate reinforced concrete beam under 3 point bending test according to attached file. I want to capture midspan load - displacement curve of beam. After analyzing force outputs for center point of loading plate are zero. I defined rigid material for loading plate.
Please get a guidance.
There isn't sufficient information in the post to give a good answer so I must ask clarifying questions instead. Does the analysis execute to completion? Can you visualize the deformation of the beam in D3PLOTs? What database cards have you requested? Do you know how to plot a force vs. displacement curve?
Yes, you have got a solution. However, it is quite far from a credible one because of the obvious hourglassing. Reduce the rate at which load is applied, check the hourglassing control cards, element formulation in the section card, etc. and ensure hourglassing is gone before you can begin your journey towards a credible numerical solution. It is a bit like "happiness"; you never truly get there 😉
I am trying to simulate seismic behavior of reinforced concrete cantilever column. A constant axial load is applied at the free end of column. Lateral loading is a cyclic displacement that applies near the free end. I want to derive load-displacement hysteresis loops. I use Mat _ Winfrith (mat084) for concrete modelling. To consider the effects of concrete crushing in compression I defined MAt_ADD_EROSION with minimum principle strain at failure (MNEPS) as an erosion criterion.Finally the deformed shape of column after analyzing is completely illogical.
Can anyone please advise on this?
I have not had the chance to look at the job but, clearly, the results make no sense. Seeing the elements fly away makes me think that the input acceleration is too high which suggests the rate of loading is unrealistic. Use a smooth spline (or whichever function you prefer) to prescribe the loading so that the acceleration is physical. Now, it may turn out that the time scale is too slow and, if that is the case, then increase the mass scaling as long as the ratio of physical and non-physical energies continues to make sense.