Seeking a Solution ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Seeking a Solution to the Ripple Problem

7 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
738 Views
Posts: 3
Topic starter
(@tguckiran)
Barista
Joined: 4 years ago

The result I got in the compression test of the homogeneous model that I worked with MAT_26 and MAT_01 cards continues to be fluctuating even though I have tried all the solutions that come to my mind.
How can I make this result smoother after the first peak force point? (Like a standard stress-strain chart)

 WhatsApp Image 2021 05 20 at 10.35.35
6 Replies




Negative Volume
Posts: 665
Admin
(@negativevolume)
CEO
Joined: 6 years ago

Hi @tguckiran

Why type of compression is this? Compress and hold?

Reply
1 Reply
(@tguckiran)
Joined: 4 years ago

Barista
Posts: 3

@negativevolume Just a typical static compression. 
We compress the specimen and then after the see densification curve stops the test and take the specimen. 
So the type is not compress-hold I guess. Just compress in the active test time.

Reply




Negative Volume
Posts: 665
Admin
(@negativevolume)
CEO
Joined: 6 years ago

@tguckiran okay I'm just trying to get a sense of what your simulation is doing, because it looks like it's a cyclic compression test from that plot. Is the time in ms or seconds? 

Reply
1 Reply
(@tguckiran)
Joined: 4 years ago

Barista
Posts: 3

@negativevolume
I can explain the model more clearly as follows:
The model is a flat compression model, that is, no lifting procedure is applied after compression.
The 20 mm long model is crushed until it is compressed by 16 mm, crushing 1 millimeter in 1 millisecond.
So time unit is ms. 

Reply




Posts: 61
(@icebreakersours)
Lab Tech
Joined: 4 years ago

Please do a better job of explaining the context, the model set-up, etc.

Reply




Posts: 61
(@icebreakersours)
Lab Tech
Joined: 4 years ago

That is a relatively better problem description. Thanks.

I think what we are looking at is wave propagation through the specimen i.e., waves bouncing around in the specimen showing up as acceleration at nodes (and, therefore, force wherever/however you are measuring it). You may have applied the boundary condition in an "abrupt" manner or you are missing damping from the model set-up. [Or, it could be something else entirely because I still don't understand the context and model set-up in detail.]

Reply







Share: