What may be the cau...
 
Notifications
Clear all

What may be the cause for "forrtl: severe (157): Program Exception - access violation" error? How can it be addressed?

22 Posts
7 Users
1 Reactions
11.3 K Views
Negative Volume
Posts: 665
Admin
(@negativevolume)
CEO
Joined: 6 years ago

@djsburra also, I see that you are using single precision denoted by the "_s_" after smp in your version. Try using a double precision version if you have access to it. This is normally recommended for Implicit analysis, but will add ~30% computation time. 

https://www.dynasupport.com/howtos/general/double-precision

Reply




Posts: 9
(@djsburra)
Student
Joined: 4 years ago

@negativevolume The double-precision thing seems to have sorted me out, I no longer get the same error and my implicit models seem to be running fine. The beer can crushing example ran pretty well.

Thanks for the tip.

Reply
1 Reply
Negative Volume
Admin
(@negativevolume)
Joined: 6 years ago

CEO
Posts: 665

@djsburra That's great news! I know this is a common head-scratcher so it's good to know that something worked to solve it! 

Reply




Posts: 2
(@ghamrawyk)
Barista
Joined: 4 years ago

Hi,

I am having the same issue and I hope you could assist me as I am fairly new to LS-DYNA. I am trying to run an example from dynaexamples.com with ICFD cards (ICFD DEM coupling example). The example should be run using MPP_d version R8 or higher according to the developer. I am trying to run the same example on my local machine from LS-Run using R12 MPP_d solver (windows). I get the same error as in this thread. I managed to reach someone from support of dynamore in Germany I guess and they confirmed that they've tried the same example on R12 MPP_d on Linux and it worked. I have tried all the tricks mentioned in this thread as I have tried using different versions of the solver still no luck. Are there any suggestions regarding this issue? 

I am attaching lsrun.out file for reference where the error is showing. 

 

Reply
1 Reply
Negative Volume
Admin
(@negativevolume)
Joined: 6 years ago

CEO
Posts: 665

@ghamrawyk have you tried running an SMP version of dyna on your local computer? MPP is usually reserved for clusters/HPC where you have many different "computers" that can split the simulation up. 

@arpit-mangal I can look into that file for you. What version of LS-Dyna are you running? And is it SMP or MPP on a local machine or cluster?

Reply




Posts: 0
(@arpit-mangal)
Barista
Joined: 3 years ago

Hi,

I am facing the same issue, I tried above mentioned solutions that were relevant to my problem but they didn't worked.

Attaching .k file, please do check and let me know the solution.

Thanks

Reply
2 Replies
(@ghamrawyk)
Joined: 4 years ago

Barista
Posts: 2

@negativevolume Hello,

For me the issue wasn't running MPP on a local machine or a cluster, it was the version of LS-DYNA for windows that had a problem for particular examples. When I ran the same problem using an older version (R11) or the newest version on Linux, the example worked. 

@arpit-mangal I hope this could be helpful for you.

Reply
Negative Volume
Admin
(@negativevolume)
Joined: 6 years ago

CEO
Posts: 665

@ghamrawyk you know what, now that you mention it I've never had an issue with this when running via a Linux cluster. So it very well be a bug with Windows dyna

Reply




Posts: 61
(@icebreakersours)
Lab Tech
Joined: 4 years ago

R13 is out. Give that a try 🙂

Reply




Page 3 / 4




Share: