Radioss vs ls dyna ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Radioss vs ls dyna vs others  

 

tmorri06
(@tmorri06)
New Member
Joined: 8 months ago
Posts: 1
December 16, 2019 11:17 pm  

Hey guys I’m looking to evaluate the different tools for fea analysis. I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on radios vs ls dyna vs other competitor solutions. what are the pros and cons of each / which is chea?

thanks

This topic was modified 8 months ago by Negative Volume

Quote
geardyn.1
(@geardyn-1)
Active Member
Joined: 9 months ago
Posts: 14
December 17, 2019 2:14 am  

for explicit analysis : Lsdyna is far better than any other software . Its ease of building any model and robustness is expectational, Material library is extensive . 


ReplyQuote
Negative Volume
(@negativevolume)
Estimable Member Admin
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 246
December 17, 2019 2:41 am  

@tmorri06

I know a few people who use Radioss. I believe it is on par with LS-Dyna and Pam-crash (VPS) for explicit analysis. Abaqus would be another option that is a little more user friendly as well. 

But yes LS-Dyna arguably has the most potential within modeling techniques, materials, contacts etc. But LS-Dyna can also be fairly unstable in certain cases and not thoroughly documented material models and other things like that.

I believe LS-Dyna is the cheapest option currently but it was just acquired by ANSYS so that may change.


ReplyQuote
Share: