Radioss vs ls dyna ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Radioss vs ls dyna vs others

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Likes
4,069 Views
Posts: 1
Topic starter
(@tmorri06)
Barista
Joined: 4 years ago

Hey guys I’m looking to evaluate the different tools for fea analysis. I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on radios vs ls dyna vs other competitor solutions. what are the pros and cons of each / which is chea?

thanks

2 Replies




Posts: 36
(@geardyn-1)
Lab Tech
Joined: 5 years ago

for explicit analysis : Lsdyna is far better than any other software . Its ease of building any model and robustness is expectational, Material library is extensive . 

Reply




Negative Volume
Posts: 639
Admin
(@negativevolume)
CEO
Joined: 5 years ago

@tmorri06

I know a few people who use Radioss. I believe it is on par with LS-Dyna and Pam-crash (VPS) for explicit analysis. Abaqus would be another option that is a little more user friendly as well. 

But yes LS-Dyna arguably has the most potential within modeling techniques, materials, contacts etc. But LS-Dyna can also be fairly unstable in certain cases and not thoroughly documented material models and other things like that.

I believe LS-Dyna is the cheapest option currently but it was just acquired by ANSYS so that may change.

Reply







Share: