AI Assistant
Notifications
Clear all

Mass Damping

3 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
3,304 Views
Posts: 7
Topic starter
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
(@kein_roboter)
Lab Tech
Joined: 4 years ago
[#636]

Hello Everyone,

I want to perform a slow speed crush simulation using explicit solver in Ls dyna, the impactor crushed the target which is held constrained by a rigid wall. As per my understanding, since the impactor has a huge displacement, I shouldn't be including this in the *DAMPING PART MASS. But as I want the impactor to come into contact with the target at t=24 ms, so at that instant should I cncrease the load curve value to 1.0  and then decrease it again? or should I increase the value at the start of the simulation (as shown in the picture, where red point indicates the moment when the impactor comes into contact)?

 

VG

 mass damping

2 Replies




Negative Volume
Posts: 681
Admin
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian
(@negativevolume)
CEO
Joined: 8 years ago

Hi @kein_roboter

Here's a good overview of damping:

https://www.dynasupport.com/howtos/general/damping

My suggestion is to first run your simulation without damping, so you can have a baseline to cross-check your results with damping. Damping is optional but if you decide to add it to your simulation, you might need to do some adjusting. Your target should be 10% critical damping.

Are you using boundary prescribed motion for your rigid walls? And what is the total displacement? If you simulation is a slow controlled crush of a vehicle, then these rigid parts will be undergoing rigid body motion the entire simulation, so your curve idea won't work. It would work if it were something like *Initial_velocity. I think the most simple implementation would be to use *Damping_global and just see what you get. Then you can try *Damping_part_mass_set and add all parts except your rigid walls. 


Reply
1 Reply
(@kein_roboter)
Joined: 4 years ago

Lab Tech
Posts: 7
Translate
English
Spanish
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Russian
Chinese
Japanese
Korean
Arabic
Hindi
Dutch
Polish
Turkish
Vietnamese
Thai
Swedish
Danish
Finnish
Norwegian
Czech
Hungarian
Romanian
Greek
Hebrew
Indonesian
Malay
Ukrainian
Bulgarian
Croatian
Slovak
Slovenian
Serbian
Lithuanian
Latvian
Estonian

@negativevolume Thank you for the insight. I'll definately keep updating my findings here.

 


Reply







Share: